News...
The Wild Life -
Feral cats "are reservoirs of disease that they
bring to your doorstep. . . . Someone has to do something
to control this problem."; [All Edition]
BENJAMIN N. GEDAN Journal Staff Writer.
The Providence Journal. Providence, R.I.: Feb 5, 2006.
pg. A.01
Abstract (Document Summary)
That has left animal-control officers overwhelmed and
turned animal-shelter managers into frequent executioners.
From 2002 to 2004, the 39 municipal pounds and eight
private shelters in Rhode Island euthanized at least
6,850 cats, according to the DEM. In Warwick alone,
the number of cats euthanized annually has doubled in
the past five years. Last year, the city put down 124
of the 412 cats it sheltered, said Ann Corvin, the Animal
Shelter director.
PawsWatch President Kathy MacPherson says the group
provides an invaluable service to local governments,
humanely treating wild cats while gradually eliminating
the colonies. The trap-neuter-return approach is non-lethal,
but it does control the feral cat population, its supporters
say. Eventually, "we want to be put out of business,"
[Patricia Munafo], the PawsWatch clinic manager, put
it.
The American Veterinary Medical Association has expressed
concern that feral cats pose a danger to small songbirds,
rabbits and mice. The wild cats also pose a public health
risk, the association says, particularly if groups returning
cats to the wild do not provide regular checkups for
the cats or administer a second rabies vaccine a year
after the first.
Full Text (2158 words)
Copyright Providence Journal/Evening Bulletin Feb 5,
2006
WARWICK - In backyards and alleyways, they are shooed
away with a hiss or a bucket of cold water. Thousands
are captured and put down every year. Their colonies,
clustered at Dumpsters, are deplored as havens for disease.
But you wouldn't know it inside the Rhode Island Animal
Medical Center, a private facility turned over every
other Sunday to the nonprofit group PawsWatch, where
the most fortunate of the state's feral cats receive
medical treatment rivaling human health care.
It is not a spa, and the wild cats come for sterilization,
not a massage and facial. But compared with the mean
streets, this is kitty heaven.
On a recent Sunday, feline patients lay on heated operating
tables, receiving anesthesia from a surgery technician
and being spayed or neutered by a licensed veterinarian.
Trapped and transported by volunteers, they received
vaccines, antibiotics and dental and medical procedures
that would cost a pet owner up to $2,000.
"We all love animals," said Patricia Munafo,
who manages the clinic for Newport-based PawsWatch.
"We do everything we can."
The twice-a-month clinic, by far the largest of its
kind in Rhode Island, spays and neuters 1,000 cats a
year. But it is only a small front in the losing battle
to contain the state's feral and stray cat population.
Nobody knows for sure how many strays there are in Rhode
Island, but it's in the thousands and growing.
Efforts to reduce the number of wild cats in Rhode
Island are largely uncoordinated -- in part the result
of conflicting agendas and mistrust among the various
groups dedicated to animal welfare. Yearly campaigns
to enact a statewide legislative solution have foundered,
exposing fissures within the community of policymakers,
animal-control officers, animal-welfare advocates and
veterinarians.
"Traditionally, they don't work that well together,"
says Dr. Christopher H. Hannafin, the official state
veterinarian at the Department of Environmental Management.
In the fractious world of animal advocacy, the groups
do agree on one thing: that the feral cat population
is out of control. But animal advocates have only recently
taken steps to form a coalition, and the years of leadership
and legislative void have left urban streets teeming
with alley cats.
The problem worsens daily. A female cat can start reproducing
at five months old and can bear three litters a year
with as many as six kittens each.
That has left animal-control officers overwhelmed and
turned animal-shelter managers into frequent executioners.
From 2002 to 2004, the 39 municipal pounds and eight
private shelters in Rhode Island euthanized at least
6,850 cats, according to the DEM. In Warwick alone,
the number of cats euthanized annually has doubled in
the past five years. Last year, the city put down 124
of the 412 cats it sheltered, said Ann Corvin, the Animal
Shelter director.
"They are reservoirs of disease that they bring
to your doorstep," says Dr. E.J. Finocchio, director
of the Rhode Island Society for the Prevention of Cruelty
to Animals. "It's a serious situation, and someone
has to do something to control this problem."
NATIONWIDE, there are an estimated 73 million cats
kept as pets and a similar number living outdoors. Captured
stray cats -- runaway or abandoned household pets --
are occasionally adopted from local pounds, but their
wild offspring, classified as feral cats, are typically
shy around humans and poor candidates for adoption.
In the wild, the yowling females are nearly always pregnant,
and unaltered tomcats roam a city, displaying violent
and antisocial behavior and urinating to mark their
territory. Many are infested with fleas, malnourished
and injured from fights.
Several cities have taken drastic and controversial
steps to reduce their homeless cat populations. Last
October, the Pawtucket City Council passed a law prohibiting
the feeding of wild cats, a policy many animal-rights
advocates deplored as cruel and unnecessary. Residents
caught slipping scraps to an alley cat face a potential
$50 fine.
In December, the Warwick City Council approved a law
requiring all cat owners to spay or neuter their pets
by the age of six months or be subject to a $100 monthly
fine. Pet owners who want to keep their cats unaltered
must pay a $100 annual fee for every unaltered pet.
Only licensed cat breeders are exempt from the law,
which is based on an ordinance in East Providence.
"When people move away, they just let the cats
go and they reproduce," Donna M. Travis, a Warwick
City Council member who sponsored the ordinance, said.
"The kittens out there are dying, and they are
a nuisance."
Last month, Sen. John J. Tassoni Jr., D-Smithfield,
filed a bill in the General Assembly that he says would
make Rhode Island the first state in the country to
enact a mandatory spay/neuter law. Under the bill, it
would cost $100 to harbor a fertile feline, and the
failure to comply could bring a $100 monthly fine.
"We're such a small state. This is a piece of
legislation that could work," said Tassoni, who
described feral cats as coyote food and blamed them
for spreading rabies and Lyme disease and causing a
general nuisance. "We need to get this under control."
Defenders of Animals, based in Providence, is planning
a rally in support of the bill on Wednesday in the State
House rotunda. Volunteers will display a paper chain
with a link for each of the 2,141 cats put down last
year in Rhode Island, according to Dennis Tabella, the
group's director.
"That's a lot for a small state," said Tabella,
who said the law could reduce euthanasia at municipal
shelters by up to 65 percent. "This bill would
go a long way to cut down the amount of cats that are
being put to sleep every year."
But, like the Pawtucket feeding ban, this proposed
law has come under fire from PawsWatch and other promoters
of animal welfare. They say it would encourage low-income
pet owners to drop off cats at the pound or simply abandon
them because they can't afford a spay or neuter procedure.
The result, they say, would be an increase in strays.
Spaying a cat can cost as much as $225, and if a veterinarian
should find distemper, intestinal parasites or some
other health problem, the bill could skyrocket.
Neutering is a form of birth control that involves
the removal of a male cat's reproductive organs; a spayed
female cat has typically had her uterus, ovaries and
fallopian tubes taken out.
Jessica Frohman, program manager for Alley Cat Allies,
a nonprofit group based in Bethesda, Md., said mandatory
sterilization laws are impossible to enforce and should
never precede the establishment of low-cost spay/neuter
clinics.
"People want to do it," Frohman said. "They
just can't afford the price."
Two weeks after Tassoni filed his bill, Rep. Peter
G. Palumbo, D- Cranston, and Rep. Robert E. Flaherty,
D-Warwick, proposed legislation to create a state fund
to subsidize spay/neuter clinics. The bill would create
a check-off box on state income tax forms to raise money
for the fund, which would be controlled by a board including
Finocchio or his designee.
NEW HAMPSHIRE passed a similar law in 1993, providing
money for a network of private veterinarians to perform
low-cost spaying and neutering. Euthanasia has since
dropped by 75 percent, according to Peter Marsh, director
of STOP, Solutions to Overpopulation of Pets, the Concord,
N.H., nonprofit group that helped create the law.
Twenty-three states have special license plates that
raise money for spay/neuter clinics. In Illinois, a
state law approved last August raises $2 million a year
for clinics from pet-licensing fees, Marsh said. In
all, about 30 states, including Maine and Vermont, raise
money in some way to offer low-cost clinics.
In Rhode Island, however, a four-year effort by the
local Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals,
to create a similar fund has faltered, in part because
of disputes over who would control the money as well
as concerns among some veterinarians about a potential
loss of business. On Thursday, a separate bill was filed
to create a similar fund but altering the board that
would disburse the money.
Dr. Courtney Rebensdorf, president of the Rhode Island
Veterinary Medical Association, has also questioned
the push for state- supported low-cost spay/neuter clinics,
saying the association already offers affordable services
for low-income pet owners, who are charged half the
going rate for the procedures.
Also, Friends of Animals, in Darien, Conn., provides
coupons for pet owners for discounted spay/neuter services
at certain veterinarians. And, a handful of independent
veterinarians also offer a similar service.
Low-cost clinics, Rebensdorf said, deprive pet owners
of the guidance offered by a private veterinarian, who
teaches pet owners proper cat nutrition and provides
preventive care.
"We want to be able to diagnose and treat and
prevent health problems before they become life threatening,"
Rebensdorf said. "If you're just dropping your
pet off for a low-cost spay and neuter, it's not ideal."
Even promoters of the universal spay/neuter bill and
the state fund for subsidizing the procedures acknowledge
that the legislation would not completely solve the
alley-cat problem. Existing colonies, they say, would
continue to flourish, despite the scarcity of food,
the region's harsh winters and the dangers of living
in the wild.
Groups such as PawsWatch have stepped into the breach
to help street cats live happy, sterile lives. Relying
primarily on volunteers and donations, PawsWatch is
following the so-called trap- neuter-return strategy
that is popular in several large communities, including
New York City, where the group Neighborhood Cats has
promoted the method since 1999. In New Britain, Conn.,
city officials recently began subsidizing programs using
that strategy, and advocates say other local governments
could soon follow suit.
In its literature, PawsWatch takes pains not to demonize
feral cats as meddlesome disease carriers, saying the
animals it rescues are hard luck critters condemned
to reproduce "in starvation and squalor and facing
poisoning or mass roundup for death."
In trap-neuter-return, volunteers attempt to capture
an entire colony of homeless cats, provide spay/neuter
services and return the animals to their old haunts,
where they are monitored by neighborhood animal lovers
who provide food. The goal is to improve the lives of
the feral cats while guaranteeing that the colony gradually
dies off.
Feral cats are a serious problem, says Finocchio, and
PawsWatch is the only group "stepping up to the
plate."
PawsWatch President Kathy MacPherson says the group
provides an invaluable service to local governments,
humanely treating wild cats while gradually eliminating
the colonies. The trap-neuter-return approach is non-lethal,
but it does control the feral cat population, its supporters
say. Eventually, "we want to be put out of business,"
Munafo, the PawsWatch clinic manager, put it.
Some veterinarians, however, do not favor trap-neuter-return
initiatives.
The American Veterinary Medical Association has expressed
concern that feral cats pose a danger to small songbirds,
rabbits and mice. The wild cats also pose a public health
risk, the association says, particularly if groups returning
cats to the wild do not provide regular checkups for
the cats or administer a second rabies vaccine a year
after the first.
"High-quality care is important," Rebensdorf
said. "If you're going to have managed colonies,
it has to be done responsibly."
Despite the frequent disagreements, there appears to
be a dtente in the works among animal-welfare groups
and veterinarians. MacPherson said an alliance is being
formed to lobby and raise money for low-cost spay/neuter
clinics. And Rebensdorf said a recent grant from the
Rhode Island Foundation will help veterinarian and shelter
administrators improve communication.
Last year, animal-rights activists got the General
Assembly to ban gas chambers in municipal animal shelters;
since August, all euthanasia has involved lethal injection.
The new coalitions, however, have only recently began
to meet, and in the interim, homeless cats have been
busy breeding.
"Every year it goes up. It's ridiculous,"
said Corvin, who runs the Warwick Animal Shelter. "They're
everywhere."
bgedan@projo.com / (401) 277-8072
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without
permission.
Copyright © 2006 The Providence Journal Company
|